Daniel Siniakov vs Dennis Andre Dutine Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Siniakov has shown superior second serve performance in recent months, capturing 41.57% of points, compared to Dutine's 27.87%.
• Regarding return stats, Dutine edges ahead with 54.35% of points won on opponents' second serve, while Siniakov wins 51.13%.
• First serve return points are slightly in Dutine's favor, with 34.78% compared to Siniakov's 31.62%.
• When under pressure, Siniakov is more proficient at saving breakpoints, with a 53.85% rate, surpassing Dutine's 40.91%.
• What about their overall performance in the past year? Siniakov boasts a 69.05% match win rate, whereas Dutine is at an even 50%.
• Siniakov excels on Hard surfaces with a 63% win rate, while Dutine's best surface is Clay, although with only a 40% win rate.
• Both players primarily compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with Siniakov winning 70% of his matches and Dutine achieving a 50% win rate.
• Considering the level of opposition, Siniakov has faced players with an average rank of 246.48, while Dutine's opponents have an average rank of 105.33.
• Interestingly, Dutine is more successful in deciding sets, winning 75% compared to Siniakov's 63%.
• Recent form suggests Dutine is better at converting breakpoints, achieving a 41.18% rate over Siniakov's 34.15%.

Editorial Prediction (July 29, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the data, Siniakov clearly has an edge on second serve performance and defensive capabilities under pressure. His ability to save a significantly higher percentage of break points makes him a formidable opponent in critical stages of a match.

Dutine, however, displays a stronger return game and a knack for converting breakpoints, which could turn the course of play in his favor. Furthermore, Dutine’s higher success rate in deciding sets indicates a resilience that could play a pivotal role if the match extends to a third set.

Although Dutine plays against higher-ranked opponents, Siniakov's superior win record and proficiency on hard surfaces position him as a challenging opponent. Considering these factors, Siniakov emerges as the likely winner in this impending encounter, given his consistent performance and defensive strength.